Log InSign Up

14 Patent Engineer Interview Questions (With Example Answers)

It's important to prepare for an interview in order to improve your chances of getting the job. Researching questions beforehand can help you give better answers during the interview. Most interviews will include questions about your personality, qualifications, experience and how well you would fit the job. In this article, we review examples of various patent engineer interview questions and sample answers to some of the most common questions.

Patent Engineer Resume ExampleUse this template

or download as PDF

Common Patent Engineer Interview Questions

What experience do you have in the field of patent engineering?

There are a few reasons an interviewer might ask this question:

1. To get a sense of the candidate's experience and expertise in the field of patent engineering. This is important because it helps to gauge whether the candidate is qualified for the position.

2. To better understand the candidate's motivations for wanting to become a patent engineer. This is important because it can help the interviewer determine whether the candidate is truly interested in the field or if they are just looking for any engineering job.

3. To get a sense of the candidate's future career goals. This is important because it helps the interviewer understand whether the candidate is interested in long-term growth potential within the company.

Example: “I have worked as a patent engineer for over 10 years. I have experience in all aspects of patent engineering, including researching and writing patents, prosecuting patents, and managing patent portfolios. I am also experienced in the legal aspects of patent law, including infringement and licensing.”

What do you know about the patent process?

There are a few reasons why an interviewer might ask this question to a patent engineer. First, it allows the interviewer to gauge the engineer's understanding of the patent process and how it works. This is important because the patent process can be complicated and confusing, and it is important to have a good understanding of it before working on a patent application. Second, the interviewer can use this question to assess the engineer's ability to communicate complex information in a clear and concise manner. This is important because patents are often very technical in nature and require clear and concise communication in order to be properly understood by the USPTO. Finally, this question gives the interviewer a chance to see how the engineer thinks about the patent process and whether they have a good grasp of the overall process.

Example: “The patent process is a complex and lengthy one that involves filing a patent application with the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). The application must include a detailed description of the invention, as well as claims that define what the invention is and what it does. Once the application is filed, it will be assigned to a patent examiner who will review it to determine if it meets all the requirements for a patent. If it does, the examiner will issue a notice of allowance, and the applicant will then have to pay a fee to have the patent issued.”

What makes a strong patent application?

There are several key elements to a strong patent application. These include a well-written and clear specification, claims that are supported by the disclosure, and drawings that illustrate the invention. The specification should describe the invention in sufficient detail to enable someone skilled in the art to make and use the invention. The claims should define the scope of the invention and should be supported by the disclosure. The drawings should illustrate the invention and should be clear and concise.

Example: “There are many factors that contribute to a strong patent application. Some of the key considerations include:

1. A well-written and clear specification that describes the invention in detail.

2. One or more independent claims that define the scope of protection for the invention.

3. Drawings that illustrate the invention, if necessary.

4. A detailed description of the prior art, including any relevant patents or publications.

5. A detailed description of how the invention differs from the prior art.

6. A thorough analysis of the claims to ensure that they are properly supported by the disclosure and drawings.

7. A declaration by the inventors attesting to the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention.”

How can you improve the chances of a patent being granted?

There are a number of ways that a patent engineer can improve the chances of a patent being granted, including:

1. Conducting a thorough prior art search to identify any potential obstacles to patentability.

2. Drafting the patent application carefully and ensuring that all required information is included.

3. Filing the application in a timely manner.

4. Responding promptly and thoroughly to any questions or requests from the patent office.

5. Working with a experienced patent attorney to prosecute the application.

Each of these factors can play a role in increasing the likelihood that a patent will be granted.

Example: “There are a number of ways that you can improve the chances of a patent being granted. First, you should make sure that your invention is new and unique. Second, you should clearly describe your invention in the patent application. Third, you should have a well-written claims section. Finally, you should be prepared to respond to any objections that the patent examiner may have.”

What are some common mistakes made in patent applications?

There are a few reasons why an interviewer might ask this question to a patent engineer. First, it allows the interviewer to gauge the engineer's level of experience with patent applications. Second, it allows the interviewer to get a sense of the engineer's analytical skills. Third, it allows the interviewer to determine whether the engineer is familiar with the common mistakes that are made in patent applications.

The importance of this question lies in the fact that patent applications can be very complex documents. There are many different types of information that must be included in a patent application, and if even one key piece of information is missing, the application may be rejected. As a result, it is critical for patent engineers to be familiar with the common mistakes that are made in patent applications so that they can avoid them.

Example: “1. Not clearly defining the invention: One of the most common mistakes made in patent applications is not clearly defining the invention. The patent application should include a clear and concise description of the invention, as well as any drawings or other materials that will help to explain the invention.

2. Failing to disclose all prior art: Another common mistake is failing to disclose all prior art. Prior art includes any previous patents, publications, or other disclosures that could be relevant to the invention. It is important to disclose all prior art so that the examiner can determine whether the invention is truly novel and non-obvious.

3. Overbroad claims: Another mistake that is often made is drafting claims that are too broad. Claims should be carefully drafted to narrowly define the invention and avoid encompassing prior art. Broad claims are more likely to be rejected by the examiner as being obvious in light of prior art.

4. Improperly identifying the inventor: In some cases, an applicant may incorrectly identify the inventor on the patent application. The inventor(s) must be correctly identified in order for the patent to be valid.

5. Failing to file a provisional application: In many cases, it may be advantageous to file a provisional application before”

How can you assess the commercial potential of a invention?

There are a few reasons why an interviewer might ask a patent engineer how they can assess the commercial potential of an invention. First, it is important to know if the invention is actually useful and has a potential market. Second, the interviewer wants to know if the engineer has considered the invention's commercial potential when making their decision to pursue a patent. Third, the interviewer may be interested in the engineer's opinion on how easy or difficult it would be to commercialize the invention. Finally, the interviewer may simply be curious about the engineer's thought process when it comes to assessing commercial potential.

Example: “There are a number of ways to assess the commercial potential of an invention. One way is to look at the market potential for the invention. This can be done by conducting market research to identify potential customers and understand their needs. Another way to assess commercial potential is to look at the technical feasibility of the invention. This can be done by evaluating the invention's ability to meet customer needs and whether it can be manufactured or produced cost-effectively.”

What is your experience in conducting prior art searches?

Conducting prior art searches is an important part of the patent engineering process, as it can help to determine whether an invention is novel and non-obvious. Prior art searches can also help to identify potential infringement risks and to assess the strength of a patent portfolio.

Example: “I have experience in conducting prior art searches for various technologies, including mechanical, electrical, and software-related technologies. I have searched both public and private databases, as well as physical libraries, for relevant prior art. I am familiar with the different types of searches that can be conducted (e.g., keyword, Boolean, etc.), and I am able to tailor my searches to the specific technology and client needs.”

How do you evaluate the novelty and inventive step of an invention?

This question is important because the patent engineer needs to be able to determine if an invention is new and has a significant difference from what already exists. This is important because if an invention is not new, it is not eligible for a patent.

Example: “There are a number of ways to evaluate the novelty and inventive step of an invention. One common approach is to use the so-called "problem-solution approach." In this approach, the first step is to identify the problem that the invention seeks to solve. Once the problem is identified, one can then look at the solution proposed by the invention and determine whether it is novel and inventive.

Another common approach is to use the "teaching-suggestion-motivation" (or TSM) test. Under this test, one first looks at the prior art to see if there is any teaching or suggestion of the claimed invention. If there is no such teaching or suggestion, then one looks at whether there is a motivation to make the claimed invention. If there is no such motivation, then the claimed invention is likely to be novel and inventive.

There are other approaches that can also be used to evaluate novelty and inventive step, but these are two of the most common.”

What are some common objections raised by examiners during the prosecution of a patent application?

The interviewer is likely testing the patent engineer's ability to think on their feet and come up with a thoughtful answer. This question allows the interviewee to demonstrate their knowledge of the patent prosecution process and their ability to navigate common objections from examiners. It also allows the interviewee to show off their problem-solving skills.

Example: “Some common objections that examiners raise during the prosecution of a patent application include:

1. The claimed invention is not novel;
2. The claimed invention is obvious;
3. The claimed invention is not useful;
4. The specification does not adequately describe the invention;
5. The claims are overly broad or vague;
6. There are prior art references that disclose the claimed invention;
7. The claims are not supported by the disclosure in the specification;
8. The applicant is not entitled to claim priority to an earlier filed application;
9. There are issues with the drawings; and
10. There are procedural issues, such as failure to pay fees or file required documents.”

How do you respond to objections raised by examiners?

The interviewer is asking this question to gauge the Patent Engineer's ability to think on their feet and come up with persuasive arguments. It is important for a Patent Engineer to be able to respond to objections raised by examiners because they need to be able to advocate for their patents.

Example: “When an examiner raises an objection to a claim in a patent application, the applicant has the opportunity to respond to the objection. The response can take many forms, but typically includes an amendment to the claim, an argument explaining why the amendment should be allowed, and/or a request for reconsideration of the objection.”

What are some tips for drafting a successful patent application?

There are a few key things to remember when drafting a patent application that will help increase the chances of success. First, it is important to make sure that the application is clear and concise. The more information that is included, the more difficult it will be for the examiner to understand. Second, all claims should be supported by the disclosure. The disclosure is what provides the basis for the claims, and if it is not strong enough, the claims will be rejected. Finally, it is important to remember that the patent application is a legal document, and so all language should be carefully chosen to ensure that it accurately reflects the invention.

Example: “There are a few key things to keep in mind when drafting a patent application:

1. Make sure your invention is novel and non-obvious. This is the most important factor in whether or not your application will be successful.

2. Draft a clear and concise description of your invention. The more detailed and specific you can be, the better.

3. Include all relevant prior art in your application. This will help the examiner understand your invention and make a decision on whether or not it is novel and non-obvious.

4. Be sure to include all claims in your application. Claims define the scope of protection for your invention, so it is important to include them all.

5. Hire a qualified patent attorney or agent to help you with the application process. They can ensure that your application meets all the requirements and has the best chance of success.”

How can you maximize the chances of a patent being granted in a foreign country?

There are a number of reasons why an interviewer might ask a patent engineer how they can maximize the chances of a patent being granted in a foreign country. One reason is that the interviewer wants to know if the engineer is familiar with the foreign patent process and whether they have any tips on how to navigate it successfully. Another reason might be that the company is considering expanding its operations into a foreign market and wants to know if the engineer has any insights on how to protect its intellectual property in that market. Finally, the interviewer might simply be interested in the engineer's thoughts on the patent process in general and how it can be improved.

Example: “There are a few things you can do to maximize the chances of a patent being granted in a foreign country:

1. Make sure your patent application is in order. This means that all required documents are included, and that the claims are clear and concise.

2. Do your research. Make sure you know the requirements for patenting in the country or countries you are interested in.

3. Work with a qualified patent attorney or agent who is familiar with the foreign patent process.

4. Be prepared to file your application as soon as possible. In some countries, there is a “first-to-file” rule, which means that the first person to file a patent application for an invention will be granted the patent, regardless of who actually invented it.”

What are some common pitfalls in the patent prosecution process?

There are a few reasons why an interviewer might ask a patent engineer about common pitfalls in the patent prosecution process. First, it allows the interviewer to gauge the engineer's experience and knowledge in the area. Second, it gives the interviewer a sense of the engineer's problem-solving skills. Finally, it helps the interviewer understand how the engineer approaches difficult situations. By understanding the engineer's approach to problem-solving, the interviewer can better assess whether the engineer would be a good fit for the company.

Example: “There are a number of potential pitfalls in the patent prosecution process, including:

1. Failing to adequately search for prior art. This can result in the patent office rejecting your application on the grounds that the invention is not new and/or obvious in light of the prior art.

2. Failing to properly draft the claims. The claims define the scope of protection afforded by a patent, and if they are too broad, the patent may be found invalid. Conversely, if they are too narrow, the patent may not provide sufficient protection for the invention.

3. Failing to respond to objections from the patent office in a timely and effective manner. This can result in the abandonment of the application.

4. Filing an improper continuation or divisional application. This can result in the loss of rights to certain aspects of the invention.

5. Making unauthorized changes to the invention after filing the application. This can result in the loss of rights to certain aspects of the invention or even abandonment of the application altogether.”

How can you avoid wasting time and money on a patent that will never be granted?

The interviewer is asking how the patent engineer can avoid wasting time and money on a patent that will never be granted because it is important to have a strong patent portfolio in order to protect the company's intellectual property. A patent that is never granted can be a waste of resources, so it is important to make sure that the patents the company files are strong and have a good chance of being granted.

Example: “There are a few ways to avoid wasting time and money on a patent that will never be granted. First, you can perform a prior art search to see if there is already something similar to your invention. If there is, then it’s likely that your patent will not be granted.

You can also consult with a patent attorney or agent to get their opinion on whether your invention is likely to be granted a patent. They can give you advice on how to improve your chances of getting a patent.

Finally, you can file a provisional patent application. This is a cheaper and quicker way to get a patent than filing a regular application, and it gives you a year to further develop your invention and determine if it’s worth pursuing a regular patent.”

Related Interview Questions